SIMIAN LINE - Simian crease prevalence in ethnic populations!

hands

- The Simian Line & Ethnicity! -

The prevalence of the simian line varies significantly around the world due to a genetic factor associated with ethnicity.

Ethnic populations & the Simian Line

In the work 'Hands: The Complete Book of Palmistry' (1985), described Hachiro Asano from Japan statistics which demonstrate that the simian line is more common in Oriental (Asian) populations. The following percentages are presented as indicative for the occurence of (complete) simian lines in various ethnic populations:

• Pygmies: 34.7 %
• Gypsies: 14.3 %
• Chinese: 13.0 %
• Koreans: 11.2 %
• Kyushu Japanese: 9.2 %
• Arabs & Berbers: 7.9 %
• Jews: 4.6 %
• Eastern Japanese: 4.0 %
• Germans: 2.8 %
• Ainu (indigenous caucasian-like ethnic group of Japan): 2.2 %
• Dutch: 1.5 %
• Eskimos: 1.3 %
• Swiss: 1.2 %

The illustration below is taken from a 2009 article from Nigeria which presents the same simian line data as listed above (featured with data from Nigeria & Iran).

Prevalence of simian line in populations around the world.

Some of the percentages presented by Asano are also cited (including specific sources) in the work 'Anthropology of crease morphogenesis (1994) by R.S. Bali from India.
Simian line varies with both ethnicity & sex-chromosomes!

Bali also described some statistics on the sexe difference of the simian crease among various populations, which indicate that the presence of a 'complete' simian crease is usually more common seen in men compared to women (compiled from page 322):

• Germans: males (N=6,503) - 2.2 %, females (N=5,274) - 0.9 %
• Indians: males (N=630) - 0.95 %, females (N=630) - 1.43 %
• Basua : males (N=191) - 17.0 %, females (N=630) - 17.7 %
• Jews: males (N=108) - 4.6 %, females (N=92) - 0.0 %

NOTICE: The data above suggests that in India (Indians + Basua) it is not uncommon to see a higher simian line prevalence in women than in men!?

But the most detailed study on the occurence of the simian crease in populations (only from Europe) was presented by the frenchman M. Th. de Lestrange (The transverse crease in Europe, 1969). De Lestrange published a review of 32 historically published studies (from 19 countries), and used 4 selection criteria (study of both sexes, sample size 1000+, no combination of samples, no specific populations) to select those studies who reveal probably the most reliable data. 24 Of the 32 studies were rejected, resulting in a selection 8 studies that met all four criteria. Six of those 8 studies included both men and women (including studies from France, Greece, The Netherlands, and 3 studies from Germany). The results of these studies for men and women were as follows:

• Germany: males (N=8,802) - 2.77 %, females (N=8,911) - 1.65 %
• Greece: males (N=2,587) - 3.67 %, females (N=1,054) - 2.37 %
• France: males (N=1,264) - 3.64 %, females (N=1,634) - 2.26 %
• Netherlands: males (N=1,000) - 2.90 %, females (N=1,500) - 1.60 %

Another very interesting simian line (simian sulcus) study by A. Tarca (2004) lists e.g. the following data for various European populations:

• Romania: males (N=2,535) - 3.59 %, females (N=2,659) - 1.99 %
• Moldavia: males (N=684) - 5.70 %, females (N=700) - 2.86 %
• Austria: males (N=316) - 4.11 %, females (N=270) - 1.85 %
• Spain: males (N=390) - 3.85 %, females (N=105) - 1.90 %

For all studies listed above together the percentages suggest that the prevalence of simian lines is often typically 50% higher in males (4,6%) than in females (3,1%). However, the large studies from Europe indicate that simian lines are observed almost twice as often in men compared to women; this might indicate that the difference between the sexes is likely smaller in populations with a relatively high prevalence of simian lines (such as in Asians).

Asano's study includes also a likewise male-female ratio for the occurence of simian lines in Japan (based on the hands of 3,775 infants and their parents). This implicates that simian crease prevalence varies with ethnicity & sex-chromosomes!

Next section:
Health & the simian line!


THE SIMIAN LINE BY DETAIL:

INTRO: The simian line: a minor physical anomaly!

HOW TO RECOGNIZE Simian Lines?
WHY THE NAME Simian Line?
HISTORY of the Simian Line
ETHNICITY & the Simian Line
HEALTH & the Simian Line
PSYCHOLOGY & BEHAVIOR: the Simian Line
BIG FIVE PROFILING: personality & Simian Line
PSYCHODYNAMIC PROFILES: the Simian Line
HAND SIGN TUTOR: Simian Line - quick summary
FAMOUS PEOPLE with Simian Lines [80+ celebs]
PROJECTS related to the Simian Line
ONLINE READINGS for the Simian Line
SYNONYMS for the Simian Line

The major hand lines.The simian line: a single palmar crease.

- NORMAL HAND LINES versus THE SIMIAN LINE -

SIMIAN LINE & HAND DIAGNOSTICS:

The hand in DOWN SYNDROME!
_- Down syndrome case study 1
_- Down syndrome case study 2

The hand in FRAGILE-X SYNDROME!
_- Fragile-X syndrome case study 1
_- Fragile-X syndrome case study 2
_(In people with autism 2% to 6% have Fragile-X syndrome!)

The hand in DIABETES MELLITUS!
The hand in RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS!
The hand in PSORIASIS!
The hand in SCHIZOPHRENIA!

The hand in Extraversion & Introversion


HAND TESTS:

MARFAN SYNDROME hand test!


Video: Elise Harris talks simian line in global populations


MORE HAND DIAGNOSTICS:

Hand lines (palmar creases)
Sydney line
Life line
Marriage line
Palm reading lines
Hand Lines News

Understanding hand shape!
Fingerprints (+ dermatoglyphics)
The Hypothenar whorl
What can finger length reveal?
The 5th finger (pinky)
The fingernail tutor
HAND SIGN TUTOR: Simian Line

More news - hands on health care!

EARLY HAND DIAGNOSTICS:
& HANDS ON HEALTH CARE!!